Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3BC61E32.5D91CEEB@nc.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2001 18:33:22 -0400
From:	Greg Smith <gsmith AT nc DOT rr DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	gettimeofday resolution

I couldn't help but notice that gettimeofday() returns the
same value for every 10ms time tick (times.cc is using 
GetSystemTimeAsFileTime).  One of our developers noted that
there are win32 functions QueryPerformanceFrequency and
QueryPerformanceCounter that can be used to gain microsecond
resolution at low cost.

(See http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/winui/timers_6mk9.asp
and http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/winui/timers_4z76.asp).

These apparently reference a 64 bit counter called RDTSC present
in pentium class processors (and above).  I am also told that
this is the method linux uses on intel to achieve microsecond
resolution.

I know, I know.  I'll try to make it as few lines as possible ;-)

Greg

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -