Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.2.7.2.20011011110633.00b81600@san-francisco.beasys.com>
X-Sender:	andyp AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:07:27 -0700
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
From:	Andy Piper <andyp AT bea DOT com>
Subject:	Re: More problems with subprocesses in 1.3.3
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3BC5DBF2.7080705@ece.gatech.edu>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20011009125357 DOT 00b61b50 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20011011094427 DOT 00b7bc60 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 01:50 PM 10/11/01 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Well, I understand ylogic -- but this "fix" doesn't please me. :-) 
>consider: "Xemacs-21.4.3 is completely broken on my machine, so I reverted 
>to 21.1.13.  I'll try 21.4.x again in a few months -- hope you guys get 
>the problem fixed...."  would not make you happy, would it?

Seems this is more like the difference between 21.4.3 and 21.4.4 than a 
whole major revision.

That doesn't mean I haven't considered reverting to 1.1.7 :)

andy


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -