delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
I realized that. I has already downloaded 1.3.3.2 and unpacked it and configured it. I am only doing this as in my 'spare time', I have other things to do. You seem to be getting paranoid. Or is it me? bill Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:03:18AM +0100, Bill Petheram wrote: > >>gdb doesn't work for me on Win2k. I am building a debug verion of gdb >>and 1.3.3-2. I hope to have more info late. >> > > You are responding to a message where I indicated that I added some > extra debugging to the CVS/snapshot version of cygwin. I didn't > retroactively add it to 1.3.3. > > Why are you responding to a message indicating that there is an updated > version to try with the announcement that you are going to try the old > version? > > cgf > > >>'cgf AT redhat DOT com' wrote: >> >>>Just in case this got lost in my previous long-winded email, it would be >>>helpful if people could try the latest cygwin snapshot and report if the >>>problem has changed. >>> >>>It would be even more helpful if people could build a debugging version >>>of cygwin and report on the gdb stack trace, if it still fails. I >>>suspect that it *will* still fail as I didn't really do anything >>>substantial that would have fixed the problem. >>> >>>However, the stack trace should now be slightly more informative. >>> > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |