Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3BBD2F1E.3060204@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 04 Oct 2001 23:55:10 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: REALLY need help prior to 1.3.4 release
References:	<20011003000916 DOT A28775 AT redhat DOT com> <3BBAA8EC DOT 3000706 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011003110421 DOT E28936 AT redhat DOT com> <20011003112140 DOT J28936 AT redhat DOT com> <20011003225215 DOT A23380 AT redhat DOT com> <3BBC63AB DOT 1070203 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011004224133 DOT A19253 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 09:27:07AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
>>I updated to "current" CVS last night around 1am EDT, and rebuilt 
>>cygwin.  After installing that, I saw the same behavior as before: raw 
>>read worked, raw write did not (Permission denied).  :-(
>>
> 
> This was really strange.  Everything worked fine for me until I ejected
> my floppy.  From that point on, I couldn't write to any floppy.  I had to
> scroll back several times to convince myself that I wasn't
> hallucinating.
> 
> Anyway, since I could eventually duplicate the problem, I could actually
> fix it.
> 
> So, how about *now*, Chuck?  Does it work *now*?
> 
> (If it doesn't just lie...)


I'll give it a shot, in the morning.  Right now I'm trying to get 
autoconf to pass its tests again.  Here's the deal:

Per the earlier discussion about autoconf-2.13/2.52, I was attempting to 
do a side-by-side installation of the two, and decided to run the 
checks.  (eventaully to write a script that parses configure.in for the 
AC_REQ[] line to determine which one to call, etc).

2.13 had "226 expected passes, 33 unexpected failures".  (On both 
cygwin-20011001, and cygwin-1.3.3-2).  This is the same as our previous 
experiments, if you remember those.

2.52 was failing all over the place with cygwin-20011001.  (With 1.3.2, 
we had finally gotten autoconf to pass all tests).  I'm currently 
running the tests again with 1.3.3-2, to make sure the 'breakage' 
occurred during the 1.3.4 development cycle and not before.  So far I'm 
passing all tests with 1.3.3-2 (but this'll take several more hours to 
complete on my machine).

All tests performed on W2Ksp2, CYGWIN=ntsec, and /usr/local/bin/mktemp 
is the implementation from courtesan.com (we had previously determined 
that "my" implementation in the misc package sucked; the courtesan 
version was good).

Sigh.  I'm not sure I have the energy for this.

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -