Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Dario Alcocer <alcocer AT helixdigital DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<15292.21680.299046.9936@coyote.priv.helixdigital.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Oct 2001 05:23:12 -0700
To:	Robert Legros <robert_legros AT yahoo DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.3.3-2: ps.exe bug for processes with a zero ppid
In-Reply-To:	<20011004083922.56277.qmail@web11507.mail.yahoo.com>
References:	<20011003111116 DOT G28936 AT redhat DOT com>
	<20011004083922 DOT 56277 DOT qmail AT web11507 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
X-Mailer:	VM 6.76 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid

>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Legros <robert_legros AT yahoo DOT com> writes:

    Robert> I do have a problem. Here, at work, there are a few
    Robert> packages (shell scripts) running. They are part of an
    Robert> important B-to-B system. Up to now it was running with
    Robert> Cygwin version 1.1.4 and all its packages as from 29 Sep
    Robert> 2000. The system does work in production for more than a
    Robert> year now.                     ^^^^^^^^^^

    Robert> In that version (1.1.4), process creation gave correct
    Robert> PPID's and PGID's. And so 'ps.exe' did behave correctly.

    Robert> I should like to upgrade the OS platform. That is
    Robert> upgrading from Windows NT to Windows 2000 and upgrading
    Robert> from Cygwin 1.1.4 to its current version.

    Robert> * BUT IT HAS TO WORK *
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Have you thought about purchasing a support contract with Red Hat?
Given that you're using Cygwin in a production environment, I would
think it would be foolish not to.  Especially since you're doing this
in a business-to-business application, where revenue is involved.

-- 
Dario Alcocer -- Sr. Software Developer, Helix Digital Inc.
alcocer AT helixdigital DOT com -- http://www.helixdigital.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -