Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 29 Sep 2001 12:10:05 +0100
Message-ID:	<4200-Sat29Sep2001121006+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 6.92 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Time-setting
In-Reply-To:	<3BB5BCE2.6387.332954D@localhost>
References:	<036d01c148c7$0c9a86f0$01000001 AT lifelesswks>
	<3BB5BCE2 DOT 6387 DOT 332954D AT localhost>

On Saturday 29 Sep 01, Gerrit P. Haase writes:
> >But I don't understand what the point is.  What problem does it solve?
> >I've never set TZ on Win98 or NT, and I don't see any discrepency
> >between ls -l and Explorer times.  So I don't know what to write in
> >the FAQ.
> 
> If I run 'date' I get differences without the TZ setting. (I get GMT output
> vs. CET).

I don't, on neither Win98 nor NT.  You don't say what system you're
using.  I am on BST now, which is +0100.

I'd like to understand why date needs TZ for you and not me, before
trying to explain it in the FAQ.

Thanks,
David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -