Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<001801c146ac$98811480$f9ffa8c0@dhcp.atl.s1.com>
From:	"David Carter" <david AT carter DOT net>
To:	"Marco Craveiro" <soupdragon AT clix DOT pt>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>,
	"Larry Hall \(RFK Partners, Inc\)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
References:	<000001c14686$b786a0a0$6401a8c0 AT atl DOT mediaone DOT net> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010926115806 DOT 017019d8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Compiling Windows Code
Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:59:18 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700

Absolutely correct -- I was making the (dangerous) assumption that the code
in question was just straight ANSI C++, not depending on Windows-specific
frameworks, beyond the Win32 API.

Thanks for the correction.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
To: "Marco Craveiro" <soupdragon AT clix DOT pt>; <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Compiling Windows Code


> You're not wrong.  If the code in question relies and MFC, there could
> be a significant porting effort involved as well.
>
> Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
> RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
> 118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
> Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX
>
>
>
> At 10:15 AM 9/26/2001, Marco Craveiro wrote:
> >uh, correct me if I'm wrong Dave, but I thought there was no free
software
> >replacements for MFC...
> >
> >Marco
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: David Carter <david AT carter DOT net>
> >To: 'Roger' <roger DOT m AT starband DOT net>; <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:28 PM
> >Subject: RE: Compiling Windows Code
> >
> >
> > > > Question.  I have some windows source code that was developed with
MS
> > > > Visual
> > > > C++ that i want to tinker with (compile, etc).
> > > >
> > > > Are there any free options that i could use? The source code is
> > > obviously
> > > > windows based (aint nothin' like linux code...looks messy :)
> > > >
> > > > I've just been told the only option is to use wine developer
> > > libraries.
> > > >
> > > > Any other  options?
> > >
> > > (1) Use the -mno-cygwin option to g++ under cygwin (search archives of
> > > this mailing list for some tips on c++ support with this option)
> > > (2) Use mingw version of g++
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> > > Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> > > Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> > > FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> >Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> >Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> >FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -