Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:01:32 +0100
Message-ID:	<4168-Sun23Sep2001230133+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 6.92 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Ross Smith <ross DOT s AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: new FAQ entry refers to "Red Hat support contract"
In-Reply-To:	<3BAE5374.F3A6B041@ihug.co.nz>
References:	<8019-Sun23Sep2001123103+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
	<3BAE5374 DOT F3A6B041 AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>

On Monday 24 Sep 01, Ross Smith writes:
> David Starks-Browning wrote:
> > 
> >     ...  This includes Windows
> >     95/98/ME/NT/2000, and, once it is officially released by
> >     Microsoft, Windows XP.
> 
> Just a small suggestion: This phrasing may lead to a bunch of mail to
> this list the day after XP is released, along "you said it would work on
> the release version, but I get..." lines. 

That's reasonable, it's bug reporting, which is fine as long as it's
after XP is released.

> Perhaps something like
> "...and, once it is officially released by Microsoft and we have had a
> chance to work out any problems that show up, Windows XP."

Doesn't seem worth it to me.

David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -