Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	"Ronald Landheer" <info AT rlsystems DOT net>
To:	"David Starks-Browning" <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: How to distribute programs compiled on cygwin? FAQ alert
Date:	Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:26:03 +0200
Message-ID:	<NFBBLOMHALONCDMPGBLFAEBCCCAA.info@rlsystems.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To:	<943-Sat22Sep2001095135+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
Importance:	Normal
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id JAA24932

Hi David,

>>> I've a little bone to pick: It's not consistent with the
>>> licensing.html page which permits any opensource license, not just
>>> the GPL. This will likely create confusion.
>> Nice catch, Robert.  I missed this.
> Sorry!  Here's what is in the FAQ now:
>     ... Unless you purchase a special commercial license from Red Hat,
>     then your software must comply with the Open Source Definition or
>     the GPL.
I'd make it ".. with the Open Source Definition, like the GPL."
                                                 ^^^^
Otherwise, ye might think GPL doesn't conform to the Open Source 
Definition..

Greetz!

Ronald


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -