delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <010a01c140fd$13e3e310$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F199 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <20010918225336 DOT G8924 AT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: [BUG] cygwin-1.3.3-2 -- making auto-import dlls |
Date: | Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:20:23 +1000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 19 Sep 2001 11:28:40.0144 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B281D00:01C140FE] |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> > > Just in case anyone knows how to do this: > > If I could *reserve* but not allocate a fixed amount of memory for the > cygwin heap on DLL load, this would fix the problem. I could > conceivably add another 512K of allocated memory to the end of every > cygwin DLL load but that just didn't seem right. > > I played around with a lot of ld script file settings trying to achieve > this effect but I could never do it. I wouldn't be surprised that > Windows doesn't allow actually it because the concept requires a > sophisticated run time loader. wrong list .... isn't this a binutils question? :]. Seriously though, someone there may well be able to answer this. On a related note, I didn't realise the fix would be so simple. My understanding was that the variables in question cannot cope with the address's being different between parent and child, and tacking a 1/2Mb on the end of the cygwin1.dll address space wouldn't affect that - that area would get relocated too. perhaps I'm missing something though. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |