Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/09/10/13:33:01
Alright, thanks alot. Is there a temporary work-around?
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:38:40AM -0400, Omid Roshan-Afshar wrote:
> > I've looked through the archive, and I found
> > some discussion about using accept() on non-blocking
> > sockets, but none on recv(). If someone could spot
> > any stupid errors in the following code, that would
> > be great.
> >
> > {
> > int true = 1;
> > if (ioctl(sock_handle, FIONBIO, &true) != 0) {
> > if (errmsg!=NULL)
> > sprintf(errmsg, "ioctl(): %s", strerror(errno));
> > return GFAPI_ERR_FAIL;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > I call recv after I do this and it blocks. I *think* I'm
> > doing the appropriate thing to make the socket non-blocking.
>
> Actually that's a bug in Cygwin 1.3.2. It should be solved
> with the upcoming 1.3.3 version.
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -