delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
From: | "Ronald Landheer" <info AT rlsystems DOT net> |
To: | "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: Automake 1.5 |
Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:44:23 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <NFBBLOMHALONCDMPGBLFMENOCAAA.info@rlsystems.net> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) |
In-Reply-To: | <3B9BFF80.9020504@ece.gatech.edu> |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
Importance: | Normal |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id DAA22550 |
Hello Chuck, > (sorry, got carried away; but wasn't Monty Python's "The Pet Shop" a > *great* sketch?) It certainly was :) > So why is the first response always to downgrade back to the old, > obsolete versions of the autotools -- instead of patching the project > to use the new autotools (or better, patching the project with > compatibility macros to support both 2.13 and 2.52(autoconf)) Because when you find out there is a problem, you want to bootstrap and build your project - so you get that done first. *Then*, after bootstrapping and building, you put your new versions back and see what the problem is. You fix, and lo and behold, bootstrapping and building works again. What I sent the original mail for, was that Automake was asking for something it should not need. I've redirected to the proper list. > I even submitted patches for libiberty to support both versions, but > it was more or less ignored. It seems the response was "we're > sticking with 2.13" > What? Forever? > I don't understand. Help me? That, I don't understand either.. Strange.. Greetz! Ronald NB: meant to ask: what is your thesis about? Just curious.. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |