Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B9C0133.1090906@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Sun, 09 Sep 2001 19:54:27 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Automake 1.5
References:	<NFBBLOMHALONCDMPGBLFEELHCAAA DOT info AT rlsystems DOT net> <x6d7501qz7 DOT fsf AT no-such-thing-as-a DOT free-lunch DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <20010909194259 DOT B11565 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:


> FWIW, Chuck Wilson has also identified some incompatibilities between
> the newest version of autoconf and libiberty's configure.in.
> 
> I wonder if we should drop back to an older version for a while in the
> cygwin distro.


AAAGGGHHH!!!! Not you, too, Chris!

The new autoconf and automake are necessary if we ever want to get 
libtool to build dll's transparently.  That's the tradeoff.

Permanent stasis with 2.13/1.4, or forward progression and some new 
features (and bugfixes.  Did I mention bugfixes?) in the 2.52/1.5 
versions.  But it means folks have to make the adjustment in a lot of 
different packages -- including libiberty, gcc, etc.

Again, *what* is the resistance?  *Why* don't folks want to upgrade -- 
even when handed a patch?

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -