Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B9B07B7.6060208@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Sun, 09 Sep 2001 02:09:59 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix?
References:	<F90xxuOCxdSBSBEKnbo0000b80f AT hotmail DOT com> <20010909014350 DOT B1936 AT redhat DOT com>

</wild stab in the dark>

Uhmmm....could this actually be due to the *known* memory leak in 
ld.exe?  (When I see 'make', I think 'compile and link' === 'gcc and ld')

Search the archives for information on this problem in binutils (I think 
Ralf Habacker posted the bug report).  He's currently trying to track it 
down and squish it with help from the binutils mailing list.

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -