Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 8 Sep 2001 15:14:14 +0100
Message-ID:	<3023-Sat08Sep2001151414+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 6.92 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: "Open bash shell here" shell extension
In-Reply-To:	<20010829145958.A6100@redhat.com>
References:	<001401c130b3$ca521220$2101a8c0 AT nomad>
	<20010829145958 DOT A6100 AT redhat DOT com>

On Wednesday 29 Aug 01, Christopher Faylor writes:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:55:28PM -0500, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
> >Could this info be added to the FAQ?  Perhaps in a new section, something
> >like "Getting the Most Out Of Cygwin"?  Or, in response to the probable
> >response, who do I send the patch to?
> 
> cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> 
> I would suggest that this is a documentation issue not a FAQ issue, though.

I've seen the question of "bash shell here" come up a few times in the
past, and I don't mind adding a new FAQ entry for it if there's no
objection.

Cheers,
David
(Cygwin FAQ maintainer)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -