Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:23:21 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Scanf with a long long.
Message-ID:	<20010906092321.H18845@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010906005413 DOT A758 AT ping DOT be>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<20010906005413.A758@ping.be>; from Q@ping.be on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:54:13AM +0200

On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:54:13AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I need use a 64 bit number, and int64_t is defined as a long
> long.
> 
> The problem is that scanf doesn't like numbers bigger then
> 0xFFFFFFFF, and always returns that number in that case.  printf
> works fine with them.
> 
> An example is doing this:
> 
> 	long long int	i;
> 
> 	sscanf("123456789", "%Lx", &i);
> 	printf("%llx\n%llx\n", i, i + 1);
> 
> it will print:
> 
> ffffffff
> 100000000
> 
> This problem seems to be reported once before in 1997, but still
> doesn't seem to be fixed.
> I'm using cygwin 1.3.2 on win98.

It's a newlib problem. Nobody implemented strtoll or strtoull
so far.  So scanf can't call them.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -