Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<004501c13606$8f1bc4f0$af66323f@amr.corp.intel.com>
From:	"Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, "Chris Faylor" <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
References:	<000a01bfaacd$ed1be870$b021e396 AT lin DOT foa DOT se> <001501bfac80$3a3338d0$0100000a AT TIMYX18EWDT6RQ> <8eaavo$i0m$1 AT cronkite DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Can't build egcs-20000417 with cygwin-1.1.0
Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2001 05:30:31 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

As you can see from the version number, this is a long forgotten
problem, corrected somewhere around cygwin-1.1.8.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Faylor" <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Newsgroups: cygnus.egcs
To: <gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: Can't build egcs-20000417 with cygwin-1.1.0


> In article <001501bfac80$3a3338d0$0100000a AT TIMYX18EWDT6RQ>,
> Tim Prince <tprince AT computer DOT org> wrote:
> >As you may have noticed, I was able to build egcs-20000417
under
> >cygwin-1.1.0 with exactly the same minor patches as under last
summer's
> >cygwin.  Now that Chuck Wilson has corrected texinfo, it may
even be
> >possible to install the .info files, if you can get around all
the
> >problems with mixtures of line termination styles in the .texi
files.
> >However, with the increasing frequency of ICE's in the cygwin
> >snapshots, which are more than enough to prevent running
testsuite on
> >g++, these attempts to use snapshot versions are looking less
worth
> >while.  I suspect that many of the additional testsuite
failures found
> >with the new cygwin dejagnu are for real.
>
> Can you clue me in on these "ICE"s you're seeing with cygwin
snapshots?
> I assume that you're referring to problems with cygwin itself
and not
> gcc and this is the first I've heard of any problems.
>
> Obviously, I want to fix cygwin problems but I won't be able to
do that
> if I am completely unaware of the problems.
>
> cgf
> --
> cgf AT cygnus DOT com                        Cygnus Solutions, a Red
Hat company
> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/         http://www.redhat.com/
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -