Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/09/03/18:22:30
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Andreas Eibach wrote:
>
>> I don't think that the section should be duplicated but I do think that
>> the setup part should have a link to the detailed CYGWIN description.
>>
>> I'd appreciate it if you could provide a patch to do this, in fact.
>
>No problem. :-)
>OK, I attached a draft where you can see what I had in mind.
>(_moved_, not _copied_, as you said, "you don't want it duplicate". It is
>not duplicate now. :-)).
>
>Andreas
>
>P.S. Actually it would be better to have the SGML (or sorta) source handy
>here, because editing the HTML reveals that it's generated by some
>conversion tool (sgml to html or similar). Besides, I don't think the
>maintainers like too see me hack around here like this, but what the
>heck...:)
Um, yeah. Any patches you send will have to be against the html source.
You can get the doc sources from the same places as the source code either
via CVS or snapshot.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -