Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/09/03/16:38:10
Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote:
>>>>On 26 Aug 2001 09:29:16 +0900
>>>>Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp> said:
>>>>
>
>>I've never enjoy the feature saving/restoring the console
>>buffer. I understand I can enjoy it with the latest ncurses,
>>vim, and cygwin packages. The vim, however, simply clears the
>>console buffer when it terminates. Do I misunderstand?
>>
>
> I found the cause of the problem. There is a mistake in the
> terminfo entry for cygwin included in the latest ncurses.
>
> $ infocmp cygwin | grep rmcup
> rmcup=\E[2J\E[?47h\E8, rmir=\E[4l, rmso=\E[27m,
> ^ It should be `l'.
Okay, I've got a few pending fixes for ncurses. I'll try to get a new
release of ncurses out in the next few days. Because we still haven't
solved the "multiple binary packages from same source" problem vis a vis
setup.exe, I'm going to do the following:
ncurses-5.2-X.tar.bz2
contains libs, dll's, headers, binaries
no terminfo database
ncurses-5.2-X-src.tar.bz2
contains complete ncurses source (including terminfo.src)
terminfo-5.2-Y.tar.bz2
contains only terminfo database
terminfo-5.2-Y-src.tar.bz2
contains a quick-n-dirty makefile and a *FORKED* version
of terminfo.src from ncurses-5.2-X-src.tar.bz2. That is,
this terminfo.src will probably diverge from the one in the
cygwin-ncurses source package. I will submit the modifications
back to Chet, so when GNU-ncurses-5.3 is released, then
the cygwin-ncurses terminfo.src and cygwin-terminfo terminfo.src
will be back in sync. Briefly. :-)
I'm doing this so that I can more quickly release updated terminfo stuff
without rebuilding all of ncurses.
Any objections to this plan?
--chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -