Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B8D2E41.7020007@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:02:41 -0400
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Michael F. March" <march AT indirect DOT com>
CC:	John Marshall <jmarshall AT acm DOT org>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug
References:	<RELAY1HJj8a5wY5vMoW00001b8d AT relay1 DOT softcomca DOT com> <017d01c130ad$7985eca0$0d76aec7 AT D4LHBR01>

Please, not again.  do NOT start this thread AGAIN.  Go back, read the 
archives where this was discussed thoroughly.  Synopsis: not now, 
*maybe* later; many things must happen first.

--Chuck


Michael F. March wrote:

> Is there a reason why all the packages for Cygwin are not
> managed via RPM instead of these compressed tar balls?



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -