Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:14:48 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: WinXP incompatibility?? wrong tests....
Message-ID:	<20010827171448.A20642@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010827140837 DOT A19062 AT redhat DOT com> <000001c12f3b$9f5e2e10$0800a8c0 AT TheLoveShack DOT local>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<000001c12f3b$9f5e2e10$0800a8c0@TheLoveShack.local>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:02:44PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
>Chris, as much as I'd love to be one of the ones 'who will eventually
>fix it', I can't be since I can't replicate these problems. My message
>was merely sent as a response to Chuck's original message to state that
>there are those of us out there who WANT to help with this, but can't,
>and as such shouldn't be grouped together with those who will endlessly
>say 'it's broke, so fix it' without doing anything about it.

I am not expecting anyone else to fix it.  I just want people who are
using XP to be patient.

There is no reason for anyone to post observations about cygwin's
working or not working on XP if you don't know anything about cygwin
internals.  Right now, just about all of the observations are pretty
much 100% McNulty.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -