Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:54:51 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug
Message-ID:	<20010827145451.A19590@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E329 AT IIS000> <3B8A9493 DOT 3090309 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3B8A9493.3090309@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 02:42:27PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Well, you have to expect some bitterness.  Count the number of problem 
>reports generated by people who don't even use OUR setup to install 
>cygwin itself.  Geez.

Here is what I said:

*>I'd have to get a ruling from other developers to see if this screws up
*>anything else.  I've got mixed feelings about putting concessions for
*>other packages in setup.  It isn't really supposed to be a general
*>purpose installation tool.

This is the second time in a couple of months that I've gotten a violent
reaction to my suggesting that I'd ask for other people's input.  I
really don't get it.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -