Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sun, 26 Aug 2001 14:13:43 -0700
From:	nasser abbasi <nabbasi AT pacbell DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Problems with path resolution
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<003301c12e73$fc57be10$1eea65d8@me>
MIME-version:	1.0
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-priority:	Normal
References:
	<D59EA43E31578445B543D05854E2957353B263 AT mn65-exuser1 DOT htc DOT honeywell DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010826162227 DOT 0258b468 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>

 
> OK, what doesn't work about it?  
 
bash-2.05$ ls -l t.t
-rw-r--r--    1 Administ None          368 Aug 21 08:33 t.t

bash-2.05$ chmod +x t.t

bash-2.05$ ls -lt t.t
-rw-r--r--    1 Administ None          368 Aug 21 08:33 t.t

I am sure there is a good reason for this and workaround (I had a quick look
at the ntsec patch/entry in the faq).

I was simply saying it does not work as is, out of the box, as it works on Unix. What is
not correct about this statment?

Nasser



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -