Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<033501c129b4$ef718190$0d76aec7@D4LHBR01>
From:	"Michael F. March" <march AT indirect DOT com>
To:	"Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>,
	"Joshua Jensen" <joshua AT redhat DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<20010820154601 DOT B1186 AT redhat DOT com> <3B816B6E DOT 9070107 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: Samba for Cygwin
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:15:50 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
To: "Joshua Jensen" <joshua AT redhat DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Samba for Cygwin


> Joshua Jensen wrote:
>
> > I show all my students Cygwin, and they love it.  Their number one
> > question, though, is "where is Samba for Cygwin?".  Are there aspects of
> > Samba that are particularly problematic when porting to Cygwin?  Are
> > there any plans for Samba on Cygwin?
>
>
> Umm...why?
>
> Samba allows linux/unix machines to export shares using the SMB/CIFS
> protocol.
>
> smbfs allows linux machines to mount shares from other machines (incl.
> windows) using SMB/CIFS.
>
> Windows ALREADY can export and mount shares using SMB/CIFS.  These
> filesharing tools are *builtin* to windows 9x/Me and NT/2k.  Why run
samba?

I happen to prefer the administration of Samba to traditional NT/2k
shares. That is also why I use Apache under Win2K instead of
IIS.

> That's like asking to port WINE to Cygwin (or port cygwin to WINE).
> It's a gee-whiz proof-of-concept, but has no practical value.

I believe there is a WINE port to Cygwin. Many of the Wine developers
wanted to be able to develope Wine under Windows.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -