Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/08/15/23:06:06
Robert Collins wrote:
> An important thing to not:
>
> AFAIK this is a testcase-only failure we're talking about. It *did not*
> affect me with cygwin, ntfs, ntsec and automake-HEAD (which had the
> chmod -R a-w under discussion.)
>
> Chuck - have you tried make distcheck with a trivial package? My wager
> is that that will work a-ok.
No, I haven't. When I get some time, I'll grab a goatbook example and
try it.
However:
After building a CVS cygwin with Corinna's fix, Chris's change, and my
modification (see other threads for details -- I will follow up in them
with the specifics relative to each topic), I was able to build an
automake-1.4l (no additional patches) that passed the three failing
tests, lex3, pr9 and pr87.
On NTFS+ntsec.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -