Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Reply-To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>
From:	"Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT Cygwin DOT Com>
Subject:	RE: Automake 1.4l released -- show of hands from cygwin/automake maintainers?
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:58:22 -0400
Message-ID:	<001301c125ff$50a28180$a300a8c0@nhv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
x-mimeole:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
In-Reply-To:	<20010815221348.A18360@redhat.com>
Importance:	Normal

Christopher Faylor writes:
>
>Can we get a show of hands for people who are actually trying to use
>automake as a *maintainer* under cygwin.
>
>I suspect that this is not a big deal and that there is no reason to
>force automake people to waste time on Cygwin's irregularities for
>this release.
>
>If a bunch of people step forward, however, then, obviously I'm wrong.

I am.

But I can live without 'make distcheck'
I can 'make dist' and then manually test it

There is also the SourceForge Linux shell account to use,
and since any project built using Cygwin and needing 
'make dist' has to be OpenSourced,  all such Cygwin Projects
also have this resource :-)

So even though I am a project 'maintainer' 
I see no reason to 'force' the good automake people
to waste time on this.

Cheers

Norman Vine


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -