Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:32:43 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: bug, man, 1.5f, MANPATH with blanks
Message-ID:	<20010815143243.B31041@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CFBF AT wilber DOT adroit DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CFBF@wilber.adroit.com>; from drobinow@dayton.adroit.com on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 02:19:16PM -0400

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 02:19:16PM -0400, Robinow, David wrote:
>Seems that cygwin is bug-compatible with every other version of 'man' I
>can find.

I'll bet it worked just fine in B20.1, though.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -