Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:17:05 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	dmitry AT baikal DOT ru
Subject:	Re: binutils is no longer experimental
Message-ID:	<20010808111705.E4406@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, dmitry AT baikal DOT ru
References:	<20010807163431 DOT A31008 AT redhat DOT com> <011f01c11fd7$a18a9c50$cd823bd5 AT dmitry>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<011f01c11fd7$a18a9c50$cd823bd5@dmitry>; from dmitry@baikal.ru on Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:58:01PM +0800

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:58:01PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
>
>> I got enough reports from trustworthy people to move the binutils cygwin
>> release from "experimental" to "current".
>
>Hello Christopher.
>
>On 18 May 2001 I had sent the attached patch to a binutils mailing list.
>DJ Delorie had approved my patch, but it never was commited. I suspect
>that it wasn't because I had made diff against binutils-20010425-2 provided
>by Cygwin and that diff could not be cleanly applied to a raw binutils cvs.

If DJ approved the patch then he should commit it.

I would just ping DJ.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -