Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:58:36 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Signal handling in tight loops
Message-ID:	<20010807195836.B31913@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010807233307 DOT 3FC3F1F9E2D AT deborah DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010807233307.3FC3F1F9E2D@deborah.paradise.net.nz>; from ejrh@paradise.net.nz on Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 11:33:07PM +0000

On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 11:33:07PM +0000, ejrh AT paradise DOT net DOT nz wrote:
>> Why don't you write a simple test case?
>
>Because I am at work where I don't have cygwin, or any compiler of any 
>form for that matter.

Wow.  You haven't been home for 24 hours?  I hope you're getting overtime.

>> This technique should be much more useful than inviting random opinions
>> from a mailing list and it should be MUCH faster.
>
>I've only had one random opinion so far.  :)

Which sorta proves my point.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -