Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:22:50 +0000
From:	Olaf Foellinger <Olaf DOT Foellinger AT bln DOT sesa DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: problems with binary attachments and mutt
Message-ID:	<20010806142250.C1108@NBOF>
References:	<3B6A0E97 DOT 32492 DOT AEE9CCEB AT localhost>; <20010803081944 DOT B1304 AT NBOF> <3B6B31AC DOT 3137 DOT B35ADA96 AT localhost>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<3B6B31AC.3137.B35ADA96@localhost>; from RPraetorius@aspenres.com on Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:20:12PM +1000

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:20:12PM +1000, Robert Praetorius wrote:
>      Looks fine.  Bummer.  That was my only guess.  Unless the binary 
> file came from a place that wasn't mounted.
> 
>      Here's an experiment:
> 
>         pick a binary that mutt will break
> 
>         mail it to yourself with mutt
> 
>         mail it to yourself with working mail program
> 
>         extract both versions to disk
> 
>         compare them
> 
> That way you can see what's getting broken.  That might help you (or 
> someone else) track down the cause.

Done this. I've compared the original and the send file. They differ on
two lines. Should I mail an example to the list ?


Gruss Olaf

--
Olaf Föllinger
S.E.S.A. AG GS Berlin
mail: Olaf DOT Foellinger AT sesa DOT de
fon:  +49-30-390722291

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -