delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:55:57 +0200 |
From: | Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Cc: | Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin version 1.3.2 |
Message-ID: | <20010806115557.X23782@cygbert.vinschen.de> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, |
Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com> | |
References: | <3B6E5DC8 DOT 21360E0F AT sibbald DOT com> <997090077 DOT 7672 DOT 14 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
In-Reply-To: | <997090077.7672.14.camel@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 07:30:36PM +1000 |
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 07:30:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On 06 Aug 2001 11:05:12 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Request for change: > > [...] > > Please consider changing the Cygwin uname to conform more closely to > > Unix "standards" by eliminating the additional information you place > > on > > the first and third fields. There's no such thing as a standard for the exact content of the fields. FWIW, take a look into the configure scripts of some well known open source projects (binutils/gcc/gdb/...) and you will see how these projects deal with the uname output. Especially look into config.guess in the top level source directory. > My .2c - your makefile is dangerous if it doesn't quote the output from > uname -a anyway. (I could add a script to a user ~/bin called uname and Agree. > read the "contributing to cygwin" link from the home page. Unless you > can *motivate* a developer, this _will not_ get done. The fastest way to > motivate them is to > 0) Submit a patch for the change you want done. > 1) give them lots of money. Except for lots of money $-) I can't see a way to motivate us at all. The current output of uname has a long history and it contains all information _I want_ to see as a developer. Especially the part in braces contains important information about the supported API of that very Cygwin DLL. I better have too much than too less information. > 2) Show a large-scale impact on the community > 3) Find a *bug* (as opposed to "feature"). > 4) Give me lots of money and I'll beg on your behalf. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |