Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 04 Aug 2001 19:27:00 -0700
From:	Wesel <wassdamo AT pacbell DOT net>
Subject:	Re: SIGILL with pthreads and sockets
To:	Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-id:	<3B6CAEF4.9C4BA335@pacbell.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ja
References:	<3B6CA668 DOT 86B5E8C0 AT pacbell DOT net> <20010804214013 DOT A6442 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> I may be wrong but I think it is unlikely that anyone is going to be willing
> to debug a program of this size.

Yes, I was afraid of that.  I've been pruning it for a month now, trying
to get it down to a reasonable size.

> 
> If you can get this down to a simpler test case it will be much more likely to
> be investigated.

Would you believe it's about a fourth the size of the full program?  :/ 
I'll try to cut it down more then... the problem only comes up when I
combine sockets and pthreads, both of which take a lot of code to
handle.  I'm not sure exactly what I can eliminate yet.

Thanks for the speedy reply!


Wesel
Who still isn't completely set up for this mailing list, so please
ignore any transient header manipulations.
--

Please do not feed me Twinkies

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -