Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:27:17 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: TCP Wrappers Port
Message-ID:	<20010727122717.I3518@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010727174811 DOT C9116 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1010727111533 DOT 24438A-100000 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> <20010727122154 DOT G3518 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010727122154.G3518@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:21:54PM -0400

On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:21:54PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:16:45AM -0500, Mumit Khan wrote:
>>On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 09:36:55AM -0400, Prentis Brooks wrote:
>>> > I am willing to take that on.  Mumit's patch does fix the issue, I did not
>>> > realize that sys_nerr and sys_errlist were managed by _sys_nerr  and
>>> > _sys_errlist in cygwin.  Just a quick question, but where is that sort of
>>> > thing documented, in the API docs?  Once I know where to look for that stuff,
>>> 
>>> Actually I don't even know why the stuff begins with undersores.
>>
>>It's an unfortunate decision that makes life unnecessarily harder for
>>existing code. New code of course should be using strerror() etc instead
>>of looking inside sys_errlist, sys_nerr etc, but there's lots of legacy
>>systems which lack strerror() interface.
>
>Why don't we add the non-underscore versions, then?  It sounds like that would
>solve some problems.
>
>I believe that the reason for the underscores is because that is the way
>MSVC does it.  I don't know why someone decided that was what cygwin
>should do, too.  It makes no sense to me.

Actually, now that I think about it a little, this is probably a POSIX
or ANSI requirement.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -