Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Lotus-FromDomain:	JPMORGAN AT JPMHUBDOMAIN@JPMORGAN AT SMTP
From:	"Noel L Yap" <yap_noel AT jpmorgan DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<85256A96.0057F738.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:00:52 -0400
Subject:	Re: per-process mounts (Was: directory hard links)
Mime-Version:	1.0

>On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 09:42:32AM -0400, Noel L Yap wrote:
>> Then is it possible to have mounts that are local to the shell?
>
>You can have user specific mounts, not process specific mounts.

I would like to submit a RFE for this feature.  Are there any reasons why
something like this would be impossible, infeasible, ...?

Or maybe there's some other solution to my dilemna?

Thanks,
Noel




This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its
subsidiaries and affiliates.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -