Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA010A8ABA@cnmail>
From:	Mark Bradshaw <bradshaw AT staff DOT crosswalk DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: SFTP server when / is c:\
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:50:54 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

crystal

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 1:46 PM
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: SFTP server when / is c:\


On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:51:53PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
wrote:
>At 12:44 PM 7/24/2001, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
>>SFTP server has some unfortunate logic that occurs when you try to ls,
get,
>>or put things in root (/).  It's got logic all over the place that creates
>>paths that start with "//".  Cygwin doesn't like to deal with these kind
of
>>paths. <grin>  This causes ls, get, and put (at least) to not work in /.
>>
>>When you do an ls (for example) sftp server creates pathnames to pass
back.
>>It does this by combining the path + "/" + filename.  This works great as
>>long as the path doesn't includes a final /, which it normally doesn't.
>>However, when you switch to / the path is / (obviously).  The ls would
then
>>end up coming back with things like //., //.., //cygwin.bat, etc.
>>
>>Seems that unix machines deal with these double slash paths, but cygwin
>>doesn't?  Am I on track here.  Either way, I'm wondering which direction
is
>>the best to attempt a patch with.  Patch sftp-server.c in lots of spots,
or
>>cygwin in (?) spots?
>
>An argument could be made either way but I would suggest that its best to
>make SFTP as portable as possible.  In that context, patching SFTP is 
>best.

I don't see any argument for patching cygwin.  A '//' means something
special to cygwin, it is allowed to mean something special, and cygwin
is not the only system that interprets '//' as special.

I don't see how you could possibly patch cygwin to deal with this.
Obviously
you can't do something like "Does //foo exist?  Yes.  Ok, I'll use that
rather
than use the //foo share."  Or, I hope it is obvious why this logic is
flawed.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -