Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.0.20010723093414.00a7c7d0@192.168.1.1>
X-Sender:	e AT foobar DOT com (Unverified)
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:35:38 +1000
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
From:	E <ecognito1 AT earthcorp DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Did some porting for cygwin
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3B5B61CE.6010901@ece.gatech.edu>
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20010722165317 DOT 00a07610 AT bastion DOT datatask DOT com DOT au>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20010723083425 DOT 00a7aa50 AT 192 DOT 168 DOT 1 DOT 1>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 07:29 PM 22/07/2001 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>You could have said that without the condescendence(tm).
>
>Didn't intend to be so.  Sorry if it came across that way.

No worries.

><crotchety voice> Well, back in the day when I provided libfreetype-1 
><cough hack></crotchety voice>  from the CygUtils webpage, it did depend 
>on X.  However, it appears that freetype-2 no longer does -- I just did a 
>cygcheck on the latest libfreetype.dll from cygwin-xfree-4.1.0/Xbin.tgz, 
>and it doesn't depend on any of the X dll's.  So, it looks like you're 
>right -- my info was out of date.
>   Sorry for the confusion.

and, no worries.

E.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -