Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.0.20010722165317.00a07610@bastion.datatask.com.au>
X-Sender:	ecognito1 AT foobar DOT com (Unverified)
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date:	Sun, 22 Jul 2001 16:59:27 +1000
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	E <ecognito1 AT earthcorp DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Did some porting for cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<3B5A3E85.9060503@ece.gatech.edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id DAA29370

At 10:46 PM 21/07/2001 -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Marcus Börger wrote:
>
>>+freetype.2.0.4
>
>NO.  this is included in the cygwin-xfree project.  We shouldn't have two 
>different (conflicting?) versions of the same thing.
>
>--Chuck

In that case, seeing as it appears to be useful for more than just X 
applications, would it be worthwhile moving it from the cygwin-xfree 
project to a package under the base cygwin distribution?

Still only one version, but a wider audience.  Freetype compiled with no 
actual source modifications once you'd frigged around with one of the 
config files a bit IIRC, so unless there are some cygwin-xfree patches to 
it that make is unusable otherwise, it shouldn't be too difficult.

E.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -