Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B57083E.3AE6FB6E@lapo.it>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:18:07 +0200
From:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	it,en,fr,es,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Security of SSH
References:	<NEBBKFFPHKAEKAIFNMBNGEODCPAA DOT sandhya DOT manmohan AT wipro DOT com> <20010717111517 DOT L25442 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>

> > I want to know how secure is SSH on NT.
> As secure or insecure as on any other system. The insecurity of
> NT is not SSH related...

I bet he meant "SSH on CygWin is as secure as a NT application can be?" and
I think the answer is "of course" (right?).
Of course ather the system is completely compromised (and it happens
frequently, it seems ^_^) nothing is secure no more.

--
Lapo Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -