Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/07/18/20:13:03
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 07:47:38PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
>
>I think I've recreated Jason's threaded Python problem after fork(),
>see the testcase below. And this is on my w2k sp2 dual pIII 850
>machine, where I have been unsuccessful in recreating Jason's
>original Python testcase.
>
>I certainly do not claim Cygwin expertise, nor Windows API expertise,
>and not as much *ix as I'd like (ask me about os/390, however, and
>I'll give you a different story ;-).
>
>But, it looks like fork_copy() blindly copies everything from the
>original process address space to the new address space, including
>any pthread_mutex_t structures. And neither __pthread_mutex_lock
>nor WaitForSingleObject() recognize that the mutex is not properly
>initialized. If the comments in the testcase are removed (ie clear
>the lock and initialize it), then the testcase runs as expected.
If that is the case then a "fixup_after_fork" routine is probably
required. You can see several of those in fork.cc.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -