Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CF76@wilber.adroit.com>
From:	"Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
To:	ntemacs-users AT cs DOT washington DOT edu
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: backslash difference in NTEmacs/CygWin in compile buffer
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:45:15 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Barclay [mailto:Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com]
> Subject: backslash difference in NTEmacs/CygWin in compile buffer
> Is this a known (or even maybe fixed) problem?:
This appears to be fixed in emacs21.
 
> Backslashes given in commands executed in an Emacs compilation buffer
> running CygWin bash are interpreted differently than on a 
> standard Linux
> setup.  
>...
> Can anyone else confirm this problem?  Any ideas where to look?
 I get the same results for NTemacs 20.7. I get the results you
expect in NTemacs21.103 (not yet released)

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -