Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:23:49 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To:	ted byers <ted DOT byers AT sympatico DOT ca>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: building gcc/g++ seems OK but building g77 seems to be seriously broken
In-Reply-To:	<002d01c10f06$2987ca70$2371e740@beak.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.1010717172110.13456A-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, ted byers wrote:

> Well, I have now built GCC3 a couple times, trying to figure out what has
> gone awry, but nothing seems to fix g77 (the summary given below show why I
> think it is seriously broken).  gcc and g++ seem to be OK since their
> respective test suites give the expected results (the number of unexpected
> failures being extemely small).

When you report gcc build problems, you really need to provide the flags
you passed to configure. Too many variables otherwise.

> 		=== g77 Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		281
> # of unexpected failures	334
> # of untested testcases		326
> /home/Bted/Objects/gcc/g77 g77 version 3.0 (Fortran Frontend version 0.5.26
> 20010617 (experimental))

Probably a problem in the g77 tests, which passes the -lm, and that causes
a problem on Cygwin 1.1.x.

Regards,
Mumit



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -