Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:14:53 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: broken CTRL-BREAK handling
Message-ID:	<20010717161453.A11212@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE1CA2EF1 AT cpex3 DOT channelpoint DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE1CA2EF1@cpex3.channelpoint.com>; from troy.noble@channelpoint.com on Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 02:06:21PM -0600

On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 02:06:21PM -0600, Troy Noble wrote:
>b20.1 handled it differently.  If I press the [X] or
>CTRL-BREAK in a b20.1 window, JDK dutifully dumps the
>stack trace.

Hmm.  I'll have to investigate this next week.  I can't easily retrieve
the B20 sources right now.

>Just one of several things that worked in b20.1 that are
>broken in cygwin 1.x.

I think I recall that back in B20.1 days, people routinely
provided details rather than make vague assertions, too.

Ah, those were the days.  Everything was so very much better.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -