Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/07/17/10:48:14
Probably to simplify installations for end users that don't have
cygwin. That said, I'd expect the -mingw method would *be* the simplest
for end users; if they specifically need cygwin functionality, then
including more of cygwin would be the way to go (having the added
benefit of being upgradable as new cygwin builds come out).
BTW: "Reply All" didn't work on this message, perhaps because the "To"
line was messed up on the original message?
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Chris Wenk wrote:
> > How can I distribute then an executable without the
> > cygwin1.dll ?
>
> You can't. And why would you like to do that? Is the resulting
> code at least GPL'd? Remember to read http://cygwin.com/licensing.html.
>
> The only way to distribute an executable without Cygwin DLL is to
> not link against it, using only Mingw and native Win32 API functionality.
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -