Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B544D05.8020301@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:34:45 -0400
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug in pthread_cond_signal under Win NT 4.0
References:	<ITDOMAIN002456UnHAa000000ec AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <00e201c10e40$103e51e0$806410ac AT local> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010716152233 DOT 01e4a168 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <3B541B75 DOT 1FAD22E6 AT bestweb DOT net>

James E. LaBarre wrote:

> If you insist that "reply-to" doesn't get used, then you have no right
> to complain when replies don't get sent to the list.


Regardless of anyone else's particular opinion on the narrow question: 
"should the cygwin mailing list software automatically insert <override> 
a Reply-To header"....

*I* can most certainly complain when I get off-list cygwin-related 
email.  Or when someone inappropriately takes a public discussion 
off-list (e.g. by not replying to the list).

--Chuck




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -