Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B5449BF.4F3E0A1D@bestweb.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:20:47 -0400
From:	"James E. LaBarre" <jamesl AT bestweb DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug in pthread_cond_signal under Win NT 4.0
References:	<ITDOMAIN002456UnHAa000000ec AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <00e201c10e40$103e51e0$806410ac AT local> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010716152233 DOT 01e4a168 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <3B541B75 DOT 1FAD22E6 AT bestweb DOT net> <20010717134626 DOT A19361 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>

yep, I read it.  Doesn't mean I agreed with it.  I do understand their
points however.

The difference I guess is that I was looking for a list more oriented
towards *users*, while this list tends more towards the *developer*
crowd (despite there being a "cygwin-developers" list).  Perhaps in the
development field, it is more common to do it your way.


Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:03:17AM -0400, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> > If you insist that "reply-to" doesn't get used, then you have no right
> > to complain when replies don't get sent to the list.
> 
> Nope! Ever heard about the SENDER'S responsibility to ensure that
> a mail will be send to the right address?
> 
> Did you actually read the text under the below mentioned URL?
> 
> Corinna
> 
> >
> >
> > Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > >
> > > Wow! Synchronicity.
> > >
> > > This just came up on the Macintosh Java Developers' list today.
> > >
> > > Please read this, if you think the Reply-To business is a good idea ('cause
> > > it ain't):
> > >          <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>.
> > >
> > > Randall Schulz
> > > Mountain View, CA USA
> > >
> > > At 15:12 2001-07-16, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> > > >Isn't there a way to get the CygWin mail lists to include the "Reply To"
> > > >field, so that this would automatically be done with most email apps?
> 
> --
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -