delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
James, Whether or not that argument is valid, as Robert Cook has already contributed his own refutation, I have never once ever on any list at any time since I've used the Internet in any capacity for any purpose, issued such a complaint or anything even remotely resembling one. I remain staunchly opposed to Reply-To alterations by mailing list software. Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 04:03 2001-07-17, James E. LaBarre wrote: >If you insist that "reply-to" doesn't get used, then you have no right >to complain when replies don't get sent to the list. > > >Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > > Wow! Synchronicity. > > > > This just came up on the Macintosh Java Developers' list today. > > > > Please read this, if you think the Reply-To business is a good idea ('cause > > it ain't): > > <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>. > > > > Randall Schulz > > Mountain View, CA USA > > > > At 15:12 2001-07-16, James E. LaBarre wrote: > > >Isn't there a way to get the CygWin mail lists to include the "Reply To" > > >field, so that this would automatically be done with most email apps? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |