Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B541B75.1FAD22E6@bestweb.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:03:17 -0400
From:	"James E. LaBarre" <jamesl AT bestweb DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug in pthread_cond_signal under Win NT 4.0
References:	<ITDOMAIN002456UnHAa000000ec AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
	<00e201c10e40$103e51e0$806410ac AT local> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010716152233 DOT 01e4a168 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>

If you insist that "reply-to" doesn't get used, then you have no right
to complain when replies don't get sent to the list.


Randall R Schulz wrote:
> 
> Wow! Synchronicity.
> 
> This just came up on the Macintosh Java Developers' list today.
> 
> Please read this, if you think the Reply-To business is a good idea ('cause
> it ain't):
>          <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>.
> 
> Randall Schulz
> Mountain View, CA USA
> 
> At 15:12 2001-07-16, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> >Isn't there a way to get the CygWin mail lists to include the "Reply To"
> >field, so that this would automatically be done with most email apps?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -