Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B538676.1030303@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2001 20:27:34 -0400
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001108 Netscape6/6.0
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	doug <want_2_learn_freebsd AT hotmail DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: natd and dhcpd
References:	<DAV23TihuWkpKyGxF7A0000a79f AT hotmail DOT com>

doug wrote:

> Anyone one if development on natd and dhcpd for cywin is happening?

Ummm....why?  why would you want to do this?  If you're trying to do 
firewalling, cygwin (and windows) are not secure.  If you're trying to 
do internet connection sharing (without worrying about security issues) 
then windows98+(NT?W2K?) have tools built in -- and speed would SUCK if 
you had to plunk through TWO separate IP stacks, each followed its own 
separate layer of cygwin unix-ization.  Blech.

AAANNNNDDDD....those little DSL/cable firewall/dhcp/nat boxes work 
really well, and cost very little, and use far less electricity than a 
whole windows/cygwin system (important when it needs to be on 24/7).

Just my 0.02.

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -