delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <025e01c10c17$a5feb9c0$806410ac@local> |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <001b01c10bd2$0efa31c0$1232ef94 AT gdl DOT uag DOT mx> <20010713230230 DOT J25442 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: Questions! |
Date: | Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:47:03 +1000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 |
X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 14 Jul 2001 03:33:51.0328 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCD28600:01C10C15] |
I have/had them fully funtional, but had problems with fork(). At that point I didn't know enough about what cygwin fork did, and now I don't have the time to pick it up again. I'm happy to dust off what I have if someone wants to pick it up and run with it. Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 7:02 AM Subject: Re: Questions! > On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 02:28:55PM -0500, Rafael Avalos Pelayo wrote: > > Dear Friends: > > > > I would like to know if with this new version there are support for fifos > > (named pipes), I mean mkfifo funtion is available? > > There have been plans to implement named pipes since more than > two years. Robert Collins was working on sth. in the first quarter > but it's really tricky stuff since they aren't implemented at all > in 9x/ME and they are implemented way different from POSIX in NT/W2K. > > So the answer is "no" for the next Cygwin release. > > Just so that nobody forgets it: Patches gratefully accepted. > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat, Inc. > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |