delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-Id: | <5.1.0.14.2.20010713134233.02524e20@pop3.cris.com> |
X-Sender: | rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com |
X-Mailer: | QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:44:01 -0700 |
To: | "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: File timestamp not updated by writes with current snapshot? |
In-Reply-To: | <4.3.1.2.20010713162617.016af9d0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> |
References: | <20010713200503 DOT 10625 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Larry, Isn't the filesystem timestamp resolution much higher in NTFS compared to the FAT family? Randy At 13:33 2001-07-13, you wrote: >At 04:05 PM 7/13/2001, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > >I updated my winsup sources from the CVS repository yesterday and > >built cygwin1.dll. Using the new cygwin1.dll, I'm seeing something > >I've never seen before, so I suspect it is somehow related to the DLL, > >which is why I'm reporting it here. Basically, a file's timestamp > >isn't being updated, despite the fact that data is being added to the > >end of it, until after it's closed. Observe: > > > >$ (echo foo; ls -l foo 1>&2; sleep 60; echo foo; ls -l foo 1>&2) > foo > >-rwxr-xr-x 1 curlbot Administ 4 Jul 13 16:00 foo > >-rwxr-xr-x 1 curlbot Administ 8 Jul 13 16:00 foo > >$ ls -l foo > >-rwxr-xr-x 1 curlbot Administ 8 Jul 13 16:01 foo > >$ > > > >The second ls output line above should say 16:01 but doesn't. > > > >Is this behavior known? Is it intentional? > > >Windows has trouble with times/date resolution. In that respect, this is >known. What DLL did you update from? I see it with 1.3.2 and 1.1.8. > > >Larry Hall -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |